1. The west parking lot will be paved the second week in September. Parking will be in front for about a week and beach access will be to the south of the clubhouse. The stairway and kiddie pool cover will be worked on the second week in October. These are hazardous areas of the clubhouse.
   
   
2. I volunteered to act as Parliamentarian because we have not received any volunteers to be parliamentarian yet or any nominations for parliamentarian. So I would like to remind everybody that this is a business meeting of the board. Any comments come at the end of the meeting. As parliamentarian, I will warn you three (3) times when you are out of order.
   

1. The motion was out of order as the discussion was about the group/resolution committee that was being considered being formed by the board to assist the Planning and Architectural Committee with written complaints that come in that have to with other than architectural & planning duties. This was made clear by President Witt and Planning & Architectural Chair, Norman Fernandes.
   
   
2. The board has no authority to give itself or its officers any additional powers that are inconsistent with the CC&R's. The authority for granting approval of individual requests for deviation from the CC&R's lies with the Planning & Architectural Committee.
   
   
3. The intent of the board was to appoint a group of volunteers to simply review the complaints as to whether a CC&R was violated, or a guideline was not followed. There was no intent of the board members to allow a committee/group formed by them to review and recommend revisions/changes to any CC&R. The intent only was to have this group assist the Planning & Architectural Committee in their duties.
   

RV on Bayshore Properties

On August 13, 2005, the board narrowly passed a resolution allowing RV's to be parked on Bayshore properties after obtaining permission from any board member which was later amended to permission from the President, Vice-President, or Corporate Secretary. This resolution did not differentiate between RVs that belong to a property owner or that of a friend or renter. The resolution also did not set a time limit for the duration of an RVs stay nor allow for issuance of a permit to identify the RV.

At this time permits have been issued for an RV with a sticker to be present upon the owner's property for up to 5 days for loading and unloading only and are not to be inhabited (occupied?). The preceding permits have been allowed under the jurisdiction of the Planning Committee as described in the C&Rs under Article II, section 9 "Habitation of temporary structures", but more directly under section 10 "Boat and trailer storage" "No boat, boat trailer, travel trailer, camp trailer, house trailer, or similar property shall be stored on any of said property without prior written approval f the planning committee." The board itself has no authority to give such permission.

I spoke to a county planner, Jessica Bondy. She told me that 100 year flood zones mentioned in county code chapter 1, section 1.1395 says that occupied RVs can be on those properties without a home on a seasonal basis. All other properties are prohibited from having occupied RVs upon them unless they are licensed to do so, such as a RV park.

In April of 2004, a survey was sent to all Bayshore members. The first question asked if "unoccupied RVs should be permitted to park at houses". Out of 408 responding, 26% agreed and 74% disagreed. The second question asked if "Occupied RVs should be permitted on Bayshore properties". Of those responding, 30% agreed and 70% disagreed. The third question asked if "RVs should be allowed to park on the roadsides (right-of-way). Of those responding, 9% agreed and 81% disagreed. The results of the survey indicate that the vast majority of the members do not want to see RVs in Bayshore.

The present Bayshore Board was elected, in part, upon the promise that they would represent and be responsive to the members needs. Allowing board members to give permission to have RVs on properties directly contradicts the C&Rs. Having RVs on properties goes against the decisions of the members.

I would like this statement to be entered onto the minutes of this meeting.

Mary Gilbert stated that with all due respect to Norman Fernandes, she called for a vote on her resolution. Roy Taylor said he can not see what all the fuss is about, because:

1. It is not against the C&Rs. The C&Rs pertain only to storage. It does not say anything about parking in a driveway, on someone's property. So this is a fallacy about C&Rs.
   
   
2. This was a thing that was done when I bought my property for 20 years, the realtor told me, this what I understood from the C&Rs, that if I had someone to visit me in a motor home, they came and parked in my driveway; I could have that person there. I did this for 20 years when I had persons that had motor homes.
   
   
3. When you rescind this, you rescind the committee, never to be seen again. This said the committee would study it and come up with a resolution. But if you rescind it that means there is no committee. It's wiped out, gone, never to return. I believe that the resolution committee is important; I believe they can come with good ideas for the board to consider. This pertains only to the committee but as only as an interim so that something could be done, it was passed. If the board wants to consider the fact that if you vote to rescind this, kiss that committee good-bye forever.
   

1. It is a consensus of the board to contact Attorney Bartoldus with questions regarding the Hayes case, to make a decision in about a week.
   
2. The caretaker position-we had 3 applicants and have finished with the interview process and we have one (1) more step in order to make an informed decision.